The diagram provides information on cinema attendance in the UK (time). Overall, it is clear that there were significant changes of (on) the percentage of 4 different age groups( from 1990 to 2010) during …… years.
Looking at the information in more details, in the 1990, the middle-age group seemed to be more interested in movie going than the others with 38% of the respondents. However, all four age groups showed a gradual increase in attendance numbers during the given period, except for a slight drop between 1995 and 2005.
To be more specific, the numbers of people between the ages of 34-44 and 24-34 has risen noticeably. There was also a substancially increase in regards of the middle-age group with 51% in 2010. By constrat, the proportion of the teenagers group grew slightly with ( up to) only 5% more from the 1990 to 2010. In particular, from the 1995 to 2005, there was a considerable fluctuation in terms of the ages of 24-34.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | minhtran2004 | view | |
| 2021-07-30 | chaunhexjdnwdindni | 11 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | Jolie Thu | 11 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | dimaria | 100 | view |
| 2020-02-10 | kimkbuni | 11 | view |
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
- The diagram provides information on cinema attendance in the UK
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 78
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 142, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...There was also a substancially increase in regards of the middle-age group with 51% in 2010. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the teenagers group grew slightly with up to only 5% more from the 1990 to 2010...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76657301266 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4894961421 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.