The diagram provides information on cinema attendance in the UK (time). Overall, it is clear that there were significant changes of (on) the percentage of 4 different age groups( from 1990 to 2010) during …… years.
Looking at the information in more details, in the 1990, the middle-age group seemed to be more interested in movie going than the others with 38% of the respondents. However, all four age groups showed a gradual increase in attendance numbers during the given period, except for a slight drop between 1995 and 2005.
To be more specific, the numbers of people between the ages of 34-44 and 24-34 has risen noticeably. There was also a substancially increase in regards of the middle-age group with 51% in 2010. By constrat, the proportion of the teenagers group grew slightly with ( up to) only 5% more from the 1990 to 2010. In particular, from the 1995 to 2005, there was a considerable fluctuation in terms of the ages of 24-34.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | minhtran2004 | view | |
| 2021-07-30 | chaunhexjdnwdindni | 11 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | Jolie Thu | 11 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | dimaria | 100 | view |
| 2020-02-10 | kimkbuni | 11 | view |
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 20
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 78
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 10
- The diagram provides information on cinema attendance in the UK
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 142, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...There was also a substancially increase in regards of the middle-age group with 51% in 2010. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the teenagers group grew slightly with up to only 5% more from the 1990 to 2010...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76657301266 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4894961421 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.