TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In these days people always are involved in many lectures, such as classrooms, work meetings, and other seminars and conferences, as a speaker or listeners. As far as listening to this valuable talks is concerned, it is a matter of great controversy that whether should we correct the mistakes of the orator during their speech or wait and tell them in person at the end of the meeting, or even not tell them because it may upset them. I-for one- subscribe to the first idea on the ground that it helps attending people by giving them the correct information, this way is more effective than the other two options, and also it will bring a vivid discussion which is beneficial for both sides, the lecturer and the attending individuals.
First and foremost, if we don't coreect the speaker, people will be mislead and consider the false data as the true knowledge. This misunderstanding can lead to a wrong decision, the consequences of which can be detrimental. Consider a corporation meeting as an example, if the a expert gives untrue statistics about the company production and revenue, it will misguide the attending people and the decision can affect their future success.
Secondly, if we note the orator's mistake during their speech it will have a much more impact. To be more specific, the speaker will give more attention and try to solve his or her misconception in the future speech. Therefore, they would be more self-confident for their upcoming letures. On the other, not telling them or tell them after everyone lives have not that influence and they may ignore your comments.
Last but not the least, bringing up the fallacy the speaker will arise a discussion among all the attendings that will be more clarifying. For instance, one listeners may ahve alternative thought about that topic which will help all people there, even the speaker, to gain more knowledge and have a more profound insight into the matter. What is more, this leads to a lively meeting that gets eveyone attention, not some boring talk.
All in all, taken into account what was mentioned above, I do believe that sometimes interrupting people's speech is the best option to correct their mistakes. Because by this way people wont be misguided, the speaker will correct their false information for the future talks, and it will bring a profitable discussion fro eveyone. So, we shoul not hesitate to present our rifg views to the speakers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- The possibility of traveling to mars by humans 81
- which do you prefer city life or country life 79
- TPO 48 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 78
- Whether a fossil is connected to the ancient bees or not.Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 75
- TPO 47 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 504, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to attend' or 'attend'.
Suggestion: to attend; attend
... first idea on the ground that it helps attending people by giving them the correct infor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...individuals. First and foremost, if we dont coreect the speaker, people will be mis...
^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...a corporation meeting as an example, if the a expert gives untrue statistics about th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rporation meeting as an example, if the a expert gives untrue statistics about th...
^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...d it will bring a profitable discussion fro eveyone. So, we shoul not hesitate to p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90776699029 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6959191414 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538834951456 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2287701834 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0641682841244 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227277586717 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234919951215 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0394278011244 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138828329124 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.