The graph below shows the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800, 1900 and 2000.
The three maps delineate how the town of Brindell and its surroundings had altered over three centuries from 1800 to 2000.
Overall, the area of Brindell tremendously changed over the given period and transformed from an agricultural place to a residential and industrial hub.
Initially, in 1800, the four areas were separated by river stour(which is in the center) and Brindell town was situated in the SouthWest of the river. There were two agricultural zones: farmland for crops and animals in North and East of Brindell respectively. A large chunk of the area was occupied by woodland at the NorthEast corner. In the following century, a few noticeable changes had taken place. Mainly, the entire grazing area had been converted into an industrial zone in the upper half while in the lower half, a new Bun Hill village was constructed.
Moreover, in the following century, drastic changes can be observed in the area as Brindell town expanded in size (almost double). The farmland as well as the forest area had shrunk in size to make way for a new Bun Hill park. Also, many more industries were opened and the overall size of bun hill was augmented.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- Some people believe that the problem of illegal drugs can be solved by just legalising all drugs To what extent do you agree of disagree 73
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home 83
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89340101523 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72185372897 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9982257557 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199956973193 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077479143965 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649034272702 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125758697728 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361870815058 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.