In this contemporary era, money plays an imperative role in every crucial decision of an individual. A handful of people ponder that higher remuneration is more essential than work satiation. I am in consummate accord with given notion. My inclination is justified in uncoming paragraphs.
It is undeniable that monetary wealth is either directly or indirectly connected with social reputation. The higher the earning, the korte respected one will be. Additionally, people can enjoy and buy things as per their wish list if the can afford that else they have to adjust in most of the aspects. To exemplify, as per recent servey rich person have to just opt as per their interest without bother about price while middle class have to balance between cost and liking. Also many people pursuing their interest as hobbies along with hectic working life.
Furthermore, due to most of the people does not know about in which area they are actually interested in, it is better to work there where they will be paid healthy amount. For instance,as per recent news letter although 92 percentage of people don't like the current working role, yet they are doing the same thing because they are not able to find alternatieve.
However, i would not overlook ther other side too. To begin with, if one would do his desire work, he can perform well enough. Irlt is also true that people do work with the view to enjoying the life. In addition to this if folk love their occupation, they not only become efficient but also take every day as a holiday. For example, lt is mentioned in great GEETA that life if not for earning, it is for enjoying beautiful journey.
In compendium, i would like to inseminate that these days money is relate with pivotal stages of life. Despite of unsatisfied job have some drawbacks, i postulate that higher salary is prime important.
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some think that students must travel to another country in order to learn its language and customs To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...letter although 92 percentage of people dont like the current working role yet they ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... not able to find alternatieve However i would not overlook ther other side too ...
^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...joying beautiful journey In compendium i would like to inseminate that these day...
^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...m i would like to inseminate that these days money is relate with pivotal stages of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'related'.
Suggestion: related
... to inseminate that these days money is relate with pivotal stages of life Despite of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of unsatisfied job have some drawbacks i postulate that higher salary is prime i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73270440252 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46268982722 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600628930818 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 318.0 20.2975951904 1567% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1505.0 106.682146367 1411% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 318.0 20.7667163134 1531% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 123.0 7.06120827912 1742% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.022291388251 0.244688304435 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022291388251 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.013737067842 0.151304729494 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119598834569 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 159.8 13.0946893788 1220% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -242.83 50.2224549098 -484% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.1 11.3001002004 1116% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.89 8.58950901804 266% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 129.2 10.1190380762 1277% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 23.0 10.7795591182 213% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.