It is quite common these days for the authorities in different countries to decide the location and features when creating a residential region. Yet, whether building taller apartments or individual houses has caused a heated debate. I tend to agree with the view that setting up residential area with tall buildings for the following reasons.
One important reason for this is that on a same size of land, comparing to a single house, a sky-scrapping apartment can meet the demand of rapid-growing population. Given the multi-storey structure, it provides extra rooms for residents. In stark contrast, if a flat-house is built instead, only one single family can be populated, which is a significant difference in terms of space availability. Therefore, it is definitely an appropriate and effective way to construct a housing area using high-rise buildings.
Those who harbor the view that building flat-house is a better option believe that they can acquire larger living space and fresher air, which could create a more desirable living environment. But unfortunately, they are oversimplifying the situation that only those affluent individuals, who are the minorities of the whole population, can afford such houses. In fact, living in apartment buildings can increase interactions between neighborhoods, which is a positive development of society. For example, when I was living in a public estates with multiple tall blocks, I met a lot of friends around the neighborhood and used to hung out and played football with them. Few years later, however, after relocating to a town-house near the countryside, I had never met any new neighbors again. Furthermore, apart from residential zone, those remained non-residential land area can be converted into various alternatives like park or shopping mall for recreational purpose.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that building taller apartment buildings is more reasonable and feasible way to create housing. Meanwhile, we should not compromise people’s living qualities while adopting certain policies.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons there relevant 78
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and five your own opinion
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a housing area using highrise buildings Those who harbor the view that building ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'estate'?
Suggestion: estate
...r example when I was living in a public estates with multiple tall blocks I met a lot o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37223974763 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0546443546 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624605678233 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 317.0 20.2975951904 1562% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1703.0 106.682146367 1596% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 317.0 20.7667163134 1526% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 100.0 7.06120827912 1416% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262128734299 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.262128734299 0.084324248473 311% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178561357932 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418428779348 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 162.4 13.0946893788 1240% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -258.74 50.2224549098 -515% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.1 11.3001002004 1134% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.35 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.69 8.58950901804 276% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.8 10.1190380762 1273% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 129.0 10.7795591182 1197% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.