The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph gives the average amount of money spending on the cell phone and residential phone services from 2001 to 2010. The average annual expenditures had several statistics, began with 200$ and ended up with 800$.
Overall, the trend of cell phone services was upward trend while residential phone services were the downward trend. Moreover, there was a surpass point between these categories in 2006, and from then cellphone services passed over residential phone services in the cost of itself.
In detail, there was a huge gap between cellphone and residential phone in 2001 when residential phone services accounted for nearly 700$ and cellphone services made up 200$, which was two sevenths in total. Furthermore, both of these two services reached similar annual expenditures in 2006, which was 500$ and also became the surpass point when cellphone replaced residential phone services in general. By the end, in 2010, cellphones reached their peak of 750$, which was even higher than the beginning of residential phone services in 2001 for 50$.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | lili__nhnh | view | |
| 2021-05-20 | Piyush seth | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Đức An | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 67
- The bar chart shows the average price of a house in the UK in different years The pie chart shows the percentage between owners people renting and those with second homes 44
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes Argue both sides and give your opinion 84
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows how people in one European city came to the office and returned home between 1959 and 2009 Summarize information by selecting and reporting key features and comparing if relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e the downward trend Moreover there was a surpass point between these categories in 2006 ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s in 2006 which was 500 and also became the surpass point when cellphone replaced residenti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12426035503 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59266146867 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 169.0 22.4926829268 751% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 866.0 112.824112599 768% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 169.0 22.9334400587 737% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 56.0 5.23603664747 1070% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292460697316 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.292460697316 0.103423049105 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226709554174 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376396776044 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 87.2 13.2329268293 659% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -91.6 61.2550243902 -150% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.0 10.3012195122 660% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.6 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.45 8.06136585366 179% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 69.6 10.9970731707 633% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.