The graph shows average annual expenditures on
cell phone and residential phone services between
2001 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting
the main features, and make comparisons where
relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average cost that American customers spent on mobile and landline phone services annually over a 10-year period.
Overall, spending on residential phone services dramatically declined, while popularity of mobile services increased sharply throughout a decade. Also, both of services met at the same record in 2006.
In 2001, spending on mobile phone services began by merely $200,while the amount of annual expenditure on the residential phone services was around $700. Over the following five years,expenditure on landline phone services gradually dropped below $600, whereas expenditure on cell phone services rose to just over $500.
In 2006 cell phones overtook landline phones, and the services became equal in popularity with customers' annual expenditure of about $550. Then, cell phone expenses surged to approximately $750 in 2010, making nearly a fourfold jump relatively to its initial figure in 2001. Meanwhile, spending on residential phone services experienced a steep fall in 2007 and went on to steadily decrease for the rest of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | lili__nhnh | view | |
| 2021-05-20 | Piyush seth | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Đức An | 61 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to moniter what people are saying and doing In many cases the people being monitored are unware that this is happening 78
- Children are using more computers than ever Discuss advantages and disadvantages and give your opinion 67
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people Some people say that younger people could be leaders Do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information with main features and relevant comparisons
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , expenditure
...around 00. Over the following five years,expenditure on landline phone services gradually dr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49397590361 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92394025626 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8909371823 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350727184526 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160813431079 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611083321793 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212077620586 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060410384871 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.