The given chart depicts the percentage of different work performed by anthropology graduates after completing undergraduate degree course from one university and the table chart represents data regarding how many salaries they received after 5-year work.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of the students did part-time work and post-grad study and many of them acquired the highest salary of $100,000+.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that more than half of the students preferred to do part-time work and post-grad study compared to only five percents in full-time work. Students who performed full-time post-grad study and not known had identical figures of about 8 percents. More than 10 percents were employed and 15 percents had participated in part-time work.
Shifting to remaining data, employees of private company overwhelmingly got high salaries than others type of employment. Maximum wages of $100,000 has been obtained by the government sector. Whereas, only 5 percents of workers that belonged to freelance consultants and the government sector had a minimum salary.
- The table shows the reason for studying the English language for the people of Japan The information is based on a survey that was conducted in the year 2000 63
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 73
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good what is your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84809402628 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 174.0 22.4926829268 774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 946.0 112.824112599 838% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 174.0 22.9334400587 759% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 28.0 5.23603664747 535% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207414517559 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207414517559 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138545472729 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160887418037 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 91.2 13.2329268293 689% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -113.59 61.2550243902 -185% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 72.3 10.3012195122 702% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.46 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.17 8.06136585366 213% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.6 10.9970731707 651% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 72.0 11.0658536585 651% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.