Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Having an occupation in the same company until retirement is the choice of some people while others are in favour of working in different organisations. Although the first idea may be a widespread selection among people, I am more willing to have a vocation in several companies.
Some people think that working in just one company is a way to guarantee their job security. They may believe that being in the same job can steer them to become more familiar with their profession day by day. Consequently, their bosses are more unlikely to dismiss them even in harsh situations such as financial recessions. In addition, being in the same business for a long time may provide them with an opportunity for a job promotion. Professional workers who are loyal to their business get a higher position according to their records. For instance, an assistant professor will be promoted to associate professor considering the years he/she has worked in the university.
Despite the advantages of working in one company, some people prefer doing a wide range of jobs. They may intend to widen their experience by having jobs in multiple companies. Being in each company has its own difficulties and learning to overcome them is a procedure in which they become a well-rounded employee. Moreover, when they change their career, they can negotiate a higher salary because they have a broad range of expertise. For example, many Web developers, who were working for various companies, will suggest more salary in their new contracts.
All in all, nevertheless, there may be plenty of benefits in working for a business all the someone work life, for me, there are some convincing reasons such as gaining a wide range of experiences and a lively work-life tempting me to work for several companies.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 78 | view |
2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 87 | view |
2021-10-25 | lethithuphuong | 87 | view |
2021-09-16 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: the; someone
... benefits in working for a business all the someone work life, for me, there are some convi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0067114094 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84609658195 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9564886373 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384997254871 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126385492645 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121618877363 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249547820791 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107839721388 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.