Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Since time immemorial, humans have had several issues related to working lives calling into question whether devoting for a firm during the entire time is much more beneficial for human beings than switching in numerous companies. From my perspectives, I would argue that it is exceptional for staff to work for distinct workplaces for upgrading themselves not only with skills but also increasing their salaries .
On the one hand, staying in the same business for a long-standing period makes employees experts at particular skills as well as helps them climb up the career ladder and saves time. First, should long - serving staff specialize in a particular sector in the long run, they envisage to be competent in this field and straightforward to get promoted to a higher position. A case of this point is a cook working in a restaurant who becomes a skillful chef after 5 years apprenticeship and cooking. Furthermore, another reason for people sticking to the same corporation is to save time. Employees do not want to waste their working time looking for new jobs and working as apprentices in the probationary period. However, remaining in a workplace for the whole time is not actually favorable for the thriving growth.
On the other hand, almost all employees crave to experience more positions in distinct companies because it is beneficial for them. Firstly, jumping jobs from one company to another frequently does a favor for employees to gain knowledge and broaden their horizon. To illustrate this point, staff are able to meet and learn from a multitude of people from various walks of life. Therefore, they can learn a myriad of things to develop and inspire their mind from them. Furthermore, it, coincidentally, is a promising promotion opportunity for staff members to move up the corporate ladder. Due to their prior work experience, they may be appointed to higher positions more easily than fresh graduates, and a new job comes with a handsome salary.
To sum up, I presume that working at different places while gathering knowledge and experience is a more sensible and faster approach to reach a high position in the work-specialisation than working at the same place.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 87 | view |
2021-10-25 | lethithuphuong | 87 | view |
2021-09-16 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
2021-08-19 | huyenphuong1702 | 78 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Food products labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...kills but also increasing their salaries . On the one hand, staying in the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, incidentally, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09944751381 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97227355662 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2734971496 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281504389249 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097004854844 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635624832604 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181833149068 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232515581748 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.