The pie charts depict that nations fish imported to America and the table illustrates that total valur of fish imported to Usa and the period taken into consideration from 1988 to 2000.
A glance at picture apparently delineates that Canada imported most of fish to Usa than other nations and the more amount of dollars spent in 2000 on imported fish.
Commencing with pie charts,In year 1988,Canada imported more and more fish to Us about 60% but,In year 1992 and 2000,Canada imported fish to Usa decreased around 30%.on the other hand,In year 1988,others nations only imported fish above than quater and In year 1992and 2000,the imported fish inclined which was nearly 50% and In year 1988,China only imported 13% of fish to America and In year 1992 and 2000 ,the ratio grew up which was around 25% fish imported.
Moving towards , the table, the total value of fish in year 1988 which was 6.57billons dollars and In year 1992,8.5 billon dollars was the total value of imported dish and the total value in 2000 which was 10.72billons dollars.
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 67
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers fewer people are writing letters Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fish') or simply say ''most fish''.
Suggestion: most of the fish; most fish
...arently delineates that Canada imported most of fish to Usa than other nations and the more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...rted fish. Commencing with pie charts,In year 1988,Canada imported more and more...
^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...d more and more fish to Us about 60% but,In year 1992 and 2000,Canada imported fish...
^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...a decreased around 30%.on the other hand,In year 1988,others nations only imported ...
^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ish to America and In year 1992 and 2000 ,the ratio grew up which was around 25% f...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...und 25% fish imported. Moving towards , the table, the total value of fish in y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9606741573 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42228864678 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.093450702 43.030603864 277% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.75 112.824112599 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366642114736 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245769393576 0.103423049105 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727577893026 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245769393576 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727577893026 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.2329268293 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.38 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.