the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The pie chart shows the information about the countries (Canada, China and others) from where fish is imported to the US while, the table illustrates the total value of imported fish from the year 1988 to 2000. Units are measured in billions of dollars.
Overall, the value of imports rose by a double over the span of years. At the same time, Canada is the most prominent supplier of imported fish started to decline and other countries became the main source.
Regarding the table, the total value of important fish was $6.57 billion in the year 1988. These figures started to change over the course of the year with the value soaring to $10.72 billion in 2000.
In the term of the source of fish imported to the US, Canada supplied the majority of the supplier in 1988(60%) while China and other countries provided only 13% and 27% respectively. But by 1992, other countries replaced Canada as the main supplier with 46% and continued to be one with 42% in 2000. China’s supply in 1992 was 34% but, that figures dropped to 28% in 2000. Meanwhile, imports from Canada fell over the years (20%) but have witnessed an increase of 30% on 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-21 | Nuttagrit Chakane | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-25 | vannhi0501 | 86 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | myhmai | view | |
| 2021-03-17 | pravallika321 | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | nirajp989 | 67 | view |
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 76
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the process of making matches Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66009852217 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33105405386 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0941784419 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34307268302 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127980589619 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139543436735 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226458107873 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139084084442 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.