the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000

The table shows the data about the amount of money US spent on importing fish over a period of 12 years, while pie charts describe the proportion of three major sources from where the US brought fish.

It is clear that the total value of fish import value experienced a rapid increase from 1988 to 2000. In addition, sources of fish imported to the US became more diverse throughout the period shown.

In 1988, US spent around 6.5 billion of dollars on importing fish. The figure continued to rise by approximately 3 billion of dollars in four years later. The total value climbed to 10.72 billion of dollars at the end of the period.

The fish import in the US was mainly dependent on the supply from Canada in 1988, accounting for exactly 60% of the total imports. However, the percentage of this source declined significantly in the following years, stood at 30% in 2000. By contrast, Chins gradually became the largest suppliers of fish to the US, with more than twofold rise over the 12-year period. There was a marked change in the figure for other sources by nearly 20% growth between 1988 and 1992 before it decreased slightly in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of dollars at the end of the period. The fish import in the US was mainly depend...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70792079208 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40877578131 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5908458497 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445205129282 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1634400588 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101751269305 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267854985387 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827585351824 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.