Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Public health has been a growing consideration in recent years. According to many, an increase in the number of sports facilities is the best solution to this issue. On the other hand, there still some who argue that there are better alternatives towards the improvement of public health. This easy will discuss on both view and will outline my opinion.
There are many in favor of fact that sports facilities have contributed to the betterment of public health. It is undisputed fact that numerous sports facilities namely gymnastics, parks with exercising equipment not only allow people to carry out exercises but enable them to experience the nature as well. For instance, there are running paths cut out around the parks which not only enables the joggers to carry out their routine jogging but at the same time they are exposed to the greenery and fresh atmosphere. Therefore it is clear that such facilities not only enhance the physical health of an individual but also bring about mental relaxation as well.
But on the other hand, investing resources only in building sports facilities will not suffice as other measures are to be concerned in the improvement of public health. In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in the number of diseases. Frequently, one gets to hear about a new disease that has been identified. Majority of these diseases are been caused mainly due to unhealthy eating habits. Take the case of heart attack. Young people who work out daily are been affected by this sickness. Many die due to cancer, which is caused due to consuming food items rich in chemical additive substances. To tackle such issues, education campaigns regarding diet and lifestyle should be conducted.
From the above-mentioned points, I can conclude that increasing the number of sports facilities alone will not solve the problems on public health, but other other measures also should be given consideration. Coexistence of both will achieve more positive results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 56
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 77
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the process of making matches Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d to the greenery and fresh atmosphere. Therefore it is clear that such facilities not on...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...olve the problems on public health, but other other measures also should be given considera...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125382263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70166481815 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553516819572 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1583065527 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267409520671 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816242936805 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905508449928 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177392524313 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709936971425 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.