The bar charts show how many local and international students were enrolled in the Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Law courses at the Bond University between 2010 and 2012.
The bar graphs depict the number of local and foreign students enrolled in Science and Law bachelor degrees at Bond University from 2010 till 2012.
Overall, the number of international pupils rose in Science department over the time period, while the local students declined a little. In Law, the enrolment of locals remaind highier than foreigners throughout.
In 2010, the strength of native students in Bachelors of Science was 1000, which was more than twice the internationals. Since than there has been a constant rise in the enrolment of foreigners and this lead to more international students studying Science than locals in 2012, with numbers close to 700.
Contrary to Sciences, the field of Law saw a surge in local admissions rather than international. According to the graph, more than 400 local students chose to study Law in 2010, which was more than twice the strength of international pupils. However, due to decline in foreign admissions, this gap grew to about 4 times in 2012 with about 450 native students entering Law studies in comparison to only a 100 foreign students.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- In the future nobody will buy newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- w 11
- The charts below show total British exports and the countries that Britain exports to 52
- The bar charts show how many local and international students were enrolled in the Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Law courses at the Bond University between 2010 and 2012 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...re than twice the internationals. Since than there has been a constant rise in the e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11049723757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79087018348 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3659440705 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317245294684 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158880129875 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118401905678 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244330256569 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127322206529 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.