An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their life. is it a positive or negative development?
In modern society, the changes are considered not only an opportunity but also a challenge. People often tend to make a move in jobs and living places in their lifetime. From my perspective, it is a beneficial transformation.
Changing the field of work is an enormous chance to learn and experience work-related skills. In the workplace, we face lots of assignments that require many integrated skills. We are white-collar workers, the tasks we deal with every day not only the paperwork but also in some particular case, we need to tackle the customer problems or the defective products. A new job might present challenges that push the person to adapt, acquire new knowledge or add to their skill set. Changing the position will help to develop a mutual skill set. Changing in the department will be perceived in-depth understanding about other fields, that help we learn a variety of skills and academic knowledge. It is an advantage in long-term development. Moreover, individuals with a wider range of job experiences and skillsets will be seriously considered for a new job opening. The secretary with excellent professional knowledge and marketing skills which was learned in the internship process in the business analysis department will receive many chances to a career in the future.
The transformation in living places is a positive development. First of foremost, it brings chances to approach the new culture and new neighbor. Living in a different place from the old one makes us want to explore every aspect of it. Not only the people but culture is the point that draws us attention. For instance, the transform in the living environment from the US to the Asian is an opportunity for us to undergo two opposing cultures, the differences in each resident personality. Furthermore, we could feel the experiences of having new friends, learn new languages or even feel the different weather conditions and decide where we belong to. The weather in the US is temperate, but in Asian’ the weather is tropical. Living both in two zones helps us find which one is suitable for us.
However, the transition from old to new is not easy. The trouble in the weather adaption, the language barrier, the initial issues when built up a new rally at works, and financial problems, are taken into condition for change. We overcome all of those, and promising opportunities are going to open in front.
In conclusion, the change process is a positive development, but it has drawbacks. We should consider all of the negative factors before making a decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-11 | lenanguyen 0710 | 56 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Other say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language 73
- some people believe that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minium legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- in many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family group Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- 11 Government should invest on teaching science subject rather than other subjects for country to develop and prgress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- 13 In the mordern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ut it has drawbacks. We should consider all of the negative factors before making a decisi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.018735363 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97766495769 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 2.52805611222 514% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.278288646 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.72 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.08 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17130975521 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522850414634 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646491017333 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101814437129 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694023171903 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.