some people believe that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minium legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
To tackle the road safety problems, we have taken a lot of measurements. For some people, the best approach is that raise the driving car and motorbike age. In my opinion, I partly disagree. It could be a practical solution, but we should cooperate with other measurements to gain the highest safety level.
Why increasing the minimum legal age is a priority method. First of all, it helps raise teenager’s awareness about attending the transportation system. Increasing the driving age will make young people take more time to learn about the traffic laws, and have a good preparation for getting a driving license which prevents them from a traffic violation in the future. For example, suppose we are allowed to use the car at 16. In that case, we will not mature enough to deal with neither the complexity of traffic signs nor dangerous situations that happen continuously on the road. It could lead to an adverse accident. Nevertheless, the age of car using raised from 16 to 21 would be a different story. The more mature we are, the more experiences we get.
However, only increasing the minimum legal age for driving is not a long-term solution. We should consider mixing it with others methods. Firstly, the government takes the public transportation system popular such as bus, to consider, which reduces the road accidents significantly. Secondly, each individual needs to have fundamental knowledge about road safety. This information could be taught in the schools by a traffic policeman and checked annually to maintain the in-depth understanding quality. Because of the learning process, young people will be fully equipped with knowledge about traffic. As a result, they participate in traffic safety.
In conclusion, raising the driving age is a short-term solution because of its benefits for enhancing road safety awareness among young people. To increase effectiveness, we should cooperate with the role of government and educational institutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-04 | lenanguyen 0710 | 78 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- 27 People say that a country will benefits greatly if its sts study abroad To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- in most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 59
- more and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents to gain the highest safety level. Why increasing the minimum legal age is ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we are, the more experiences we get. However, only increasing the minimum leg...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23659305994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97925102495 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574132492114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8906961761 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0476190476 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0952380952 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215229643542 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640547391327 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806529897987 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146577666162 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371342786603 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.