The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The given illustration provides the percentage of visitors who going to a main Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
It is clear that the proportion of people visiting a Caribbean island reached a peak in 2017. On the other hand, tourists had the lowest percentages in 2010.
There was gradual increase in the number of people visiting a Caribbean island over a period of 2 years: about 1 million in 2010, 1,25 million in 2011 and 1,5 million in 2012. Furthermore, visitors had a sudden climb between 2012 and 2014; about 1,5 million in 2012, 2 million in 2013 and 2,5 million in 2014. Besides, tourists remained the same stable in 2015, 2016: about 2,75 million.
Visitors staying on island were high in comparison with those staying on cruise ships in 2015: between 1,5 million and 1,25 million. However, in 2016, people showed their preference for staying on cruise ships rather than staying on island: about from 1,5 million to 1,25 million. In addition to, the number of visitors travelling on cruise ships was twice than those on island: about 2 million and 1 million.
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things some people claim that the broken things should be repaired and used again What factors cause this phenomennon What effects this phenomennon leads to 78
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 60
- Topic Researcher shows that global warming is caused by human activity What are the possible reasons and effects of climate change and what can government and individuals do to reduce these 67
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 to 2000 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83243243243 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4723097619 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502702702703 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2632596786 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190238485131 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101211615979 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532377514568 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151973161154 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569745276255 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.