The bar graph depicts the extent of participation in education and science from people of developing and industrialized countries in the years 1980 and 1990. It compares different aspects like the number of years spent on schooling, scientists and technicians in every thousand persons, and expenditure on research and development during these years.
Overall, industrialized nations lead by large margins in all aspects during this period. There was an increase in numbers between these years in the case of countries that are industrialized. On the other hand, developing countries showed a rise in these cases except for expenditure on research and development where it fell.
Between 1980 and 1990, there was no significant increase in average schooling years when developing countries are considered. The other rose from 8 to 10 approximately. In the same duration, a drastic surge in the number of scientists and technicians per 1000 people can be seen in industrialized nations from 40 to almost 70. Nonetheless, the latter was below 20 all along.
In the case of spending on research and development, industrialized countries skyrocketed from 150 to 350 between these years. On contrary, developing nations declined from 50 to roughly 20 from 1980 to 1990.
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 73
- In most successful companies some people think that communication between employers and workers is the most important factor other people say that other factors are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velopment where it fell. Between 1980 and 1990, there was no significant incre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, so, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20373219855 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7738117081 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6363636364 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229904955774 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910541308296 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109395545163 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146291851128 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609592660991 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.