The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area
The pictures give data about the layout of a single room and a double room having study facilities.
Overall, what stands out is that a double room is larger and more expensive compared to a single one. There are also more beds, study desks, cupboards in a double room.
Looking at the details, a single room costs $200 per week, whereas a double one is nearly twice as dear as, costing $350 per week. Both rooms are 6m long, but a double room is 4m wide compared to 2,5m of a single room.
To the left of the single room, there are two bookshelves between the bathroom and the kitchen. Both kitchens have a stove, a sink, and a microwave. The double room also has a table to the right of the kitchen. Whilst, there is a bed at the bottom right corner of the single room, the double one has two beds at the top and bottom right corner, each has a window as well.
Turning to the center, a single room has only a cupboard. It also has a study desk and a TV on the north and south wall respectively. With respect to a double room, the television is replaced by another study desk. Two cupboards are located in the center with a TV and a bookshelf in front of them. Another bookshelf is between the bathroom and the study desk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 72
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 73
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport 89
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, well, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24358974359 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28106272004 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465811965812 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4917639371 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9285714286 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365676130019 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149584704102 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916286380607 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239497070915 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521139486914 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.02 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.25 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.