If people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, using e-mail or text messaging is better than using telephone or voice messaging.
Some people insist that people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others using text or email better than using phone or voice messaging. On the other hand, others reject the idea. Among these different reasons, I prefer to use text or email over telephone or voice messaging for persuasive reasons.
To begin with, I can’t show my sincerity. With messages, I can’t express every emotion that I have through texts. Every person has their own styles of messaging. Some people tend to write long, some people tend to write short. Therefore, people can perceive the meaning of a message in a wrong way and might get irritated. Particularly, when discussing controversial topics that make people sensitive about minor things. This can cause conflict and misunderstanding. On the other hand, through telephone or voice messaging, I can show my sincerity to the opponent. Whether my conversation is short or long, I can show my sincerity and efforts by expressing my emotions words by words. This will help to avoid conflicts along with misunderstanding and it delivers the clear meaning that I wanted.
Furthermore, I can’t get a reply immediately. People can’t reply to the message unless they check their email frequently. Conversely, with voice messaging and telephone, people will notice an alarm instantly and tend to reply. A prompt reply is crucial when discussing controversial problems. If a reply is slow, communication will be difficult and it’s hard to get opinions from opponents.
In conclusion, I disagree that people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others using emails rather than using telephone or voice messaging for the reasons I mentioned above.
- If people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others using e mail or text messaging is better than using telephone or voice messaging 70
- some people say people taking risks can be more successful than people who are careful and cautious what is your opinion 60
- 3
- some people think that the important role of university professors is to do research others think the main role of them is to educate students 70
- A university should focus more on its facilities such as libraries computers or laboratory rather than on hiring famous teachers 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e can perceive the meaning of a message in a wrong way and might get irritated. Particularly, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 274.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32481751825 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98451122665 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9141738514 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7894736842 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465614151545 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126695475291 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174130796872 0.0737576698707 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369931688131 0.150856017488 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.229038142149 0.0645574589148 355% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.