Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people claim that students should learn how to cook and prepare food, while others claim that it is more beneficial for them to learn important subjects. In my opinion, it is more important to spend time on school subjects, rather than on cooking lessons. Let us discuss both views.
First of all, spending time on school subjects is required for future work. Most students pay more attention to subjects that their future job will be associated with. Althought, theoretical knowledge usually appears to be not very relevant for the job, it gives a good basis for practical skills.
Secondly, school subjects give us general knowledge which is required for life. During the lessons students learn how to write, count and read. Older teenagers study history and science, which makes them intelligent and educated people. Knowledge of some facts like beginning of WWI is obligatory and makes a person - person.
Finally, we study subjects to get some useful skills such as critical thinking, communication and investigation abilities. During educational process students conduct researches, talk to each other and communicate, which develops their communication and investigation skills. On the math lessons students develop their critical thinking .
Opponents claim that science of food is more important than general school lessons. It can be argued that it is better to learn something that one will undoubtedly need in life like cooking. Students learn tons of useless information like higher math and other subjects that one will not need in future life.
However, I still believe that students can learn cooking home with their mothers for example. School time should be totally dedicated to important subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts show air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts show air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 82
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...students develop their critical thinking . Opponents claim that science of food...
^^
Line 11, column 50, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
...I still believe that students can learn cooking home with their mothers for example. Sc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37867647059 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66468599298 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1267263071 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2777777778 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341961133246 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984938450501 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585307754687 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162349212706 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534067339619 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.