It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment, their manufacture and their use continue to increase.
Why is it the case? How can this be controlled?
It is generally the case that air contamination is a serious problem which humankind is facing to date. Although people have widely acknowledged the negative effects of automobiles on their living environment, they proceed to make and use them excessively. There are some potential reasons regarding this, and many possible measures can be used to solve the problem.
To begin with, plenty of plausible reasons grounds are leading to this situation. One of them is the flexibility of traveling by cars. In other words, this mode of transportation eliminates the hassles of reserving tickets of public transport such as buses and trains. As a result, commuters can go to work, shopping and follow their pursuits at the convenience without depending on fixed schedules or any means of community transport. Another contributing factor is that private automobiles can provide a great sense of pleasure and comfort. To be more specific, people could have favorable touring holidays whenever and wherever they desire with their own vehicles. Especially, a few cars models can be innovative with accommodation and other facilities to better serve people during their traveling.
However, some feasible measures could be taken to tackle this significant threat of increased car production and use. The most effective solution can be stricter taxation policies. For example, governments should impose a particular higher tax rate on cars with high emissions while supplying highest-cost benefits to consumers choosing low-emissions car models. Another certain practice could be raising the awareness of using alternative public transportation among citizens. One typical instance is that there should be compulsory educational programs or regular public campaigns aiming at helping people of all ages understand the harms of car overuse and merits of alternative means. By doing this, it is hoped that they would have more environmentally-friendly travel options and behaviors.
In conclusion, the flexibility and sense of pleasure are the two main driving forces that contribute to the constant use of automobiles. Nonetheless, this problem could be alleviated by higher taxation actions and public awareness enhancement as described above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- It is more important to spend on public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts show the percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and towns between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree 56
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6017699115 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16259408949 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616519174041 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8606933212 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248577392681 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701143948554 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464847585694 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142820298047 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433677878788 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.