Should mathematics and philosophy be compulsory at school? To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some believe that subjects such as math and philosophy should be made mandatory at school while others subscribe to the point that it is up to students to decide the subjects. This essay agrees completely with the former point of view for two main reasons. Firstly, studying mathematics is essential to acquire basic knowledge to survive and to be motivated to give birth to great inventions. Secondly, being expert in philosophy is vital for one to understand and work to improve society growth and individual development.
One of the compelling reason which supports my argument is that the ability to calculate and do basic levels of arithmetic is indispensable for children who are soon-to-be adults to survive in life. This can be further illustrated from the fact that children must be able to be familiar with basic figures and work with numbers to carry out daily tasks like going to the market, do business with others or balancing financial budgets. A prime example of this would be a study conducted by the University of Michigan which indicates that students who had approached math in early ages find it easier to adapt to the ever-changing contexts of life. Additionally, it is also argued that the mysteries of mathematical equations can intrigue and motivate students to give birth to revolutionary inventions. In fact, a survey concluded by the Cambridge University has shown that 80% of those inventions that have changed unconscious practices of human’ daily lives are originated from those who were familiar with the applications of math in their younger days.
Another important justification worth mentioning is that subjects like philosophy is beyond important for students to make sense of fundamentals that are vital for societal and individual growth. To be more specific, students that understand the basic rules and definitions of life can penetrate how the law regulate the society in a way that is to meet the demand of the whole community. In this way, students can identify true problems associating with their society and find solutions to tackle them. In addition, learning philosophy can be beneficial for oneself. Exploring the philosophical world can cultivate one’s self-awareness and things around them. To illustrate, it is evinced from researches that people who are experts in philosophy tend to live in harmony with others and refrain from difficult situations for the sake of profits.
In conclusion, mathematics and philosophy bear significant values to human lives. Therefore, it is my firm conviction that these two subjects should be compulsory for students for the fact that maths is essential for children to use in daily lives and to be motivated to create revolutionary inventions, whereas, philosophy is important for student to get insightful perspectives on societal and individual values, thus, be able to improve both aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...rithmetic is indispensable for children who are soon-to-be adults to survive in life. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... is evinced from researches that people who are experts in philosophy tend to live in h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 13.1623246493 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 41.998997996 188% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 463.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24838012959 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99541483234 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511879049676 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7975815163 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.941176471 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2352941176 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184132022623 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616991660185 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495254547722 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128214610329 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561926642941 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.