The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this modern era, where everyone is busy as a bee and nobody has time to stand and stare, it is important to understand that new ideas and innovations can arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. One just needs to look around in the environment and critically analyze an issue to form a solution. A simple or a naïve idea might be the solution to a very complex problem.
Taking an example of a complex field like physics, most of the laws such as gravitational laws, reflective properties arose from commonplaces such as sitting under a tree or glancing towards the ocean. Asking the question “Why”, is indeed important for creating the best ideas. This not only helps us to understand a situation better also helps us in thinking more logically. One could also take the example of Elon Musk, the most popular tech-biz of this era. The introduction of self-driving cars and cost-efficient satellites gives us an essence of the importance of understanding commonplace things. Electric vehicles, which was a far-fetched idea in the past, are now the new “trend” in the vehicle industry. This shows that if a person is passionate about commonplace things even vague or simple ideas might lead to a gargantuan accomplishment.
One could argue that looking at the current development in the research field, they might need to undergo extensive research instead of looking in our environment. This belies the fact that there is still a lot of scope of improvement in different domains which are not given enough attention. For example, the coronavirus situation has proven that the health industry, the government still needs a lot of improvement to handle these situations better. Also, with the increase of factories and industries, environmentally-friendly solutions are still a mystery in this domain. One needs to analyze these situations and exhibit their passion, determination and dedication to unravel these mysteries.
In conclusion, with the current advancements in technology, where one could get any information with a single click, and the high computational power of the gadgets and gizmos, it is much easier to provide solutions to the complex situations present in our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-27 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supp 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be s 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 58
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'Asking' instead.
Suggestion: Asking
...r a tree or glancing towards the ocean. Asking the question “Why”, is indeed important for creating...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21448467967 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20773103788 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557103064067 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5302929717 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121486312625 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380452761284 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304032028888 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687137440641 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307469401537 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.