The charts show the sales of new cars in Australia in 1984, 1993, 2013
The given illustrations provide information about new cars turnovers in Australia in three particular years namely 1984, 1993 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that total of new cars sales in Australia increased from 1984 to 2013 and sales of Sedan was the main source income during the period.
The Sedans sales were highest and accounted over a half in three years, about 55% in 1984, 50% in 1993 and 57 % in 2013. In addition to, there was nearly a fifth of total sales of new cars was from SVUs in 1984, particularly 19% and this remained the same stable in 2013. The turnovers of other new cars in Australia were over a quarter in 1984, 1993 with 26 % and 29% while these were under a quarter in 2013 with 24%.
The SVUs sales jumped from 19% in 1984 to 21 % in 1993 before decreased by 19 % in 2013. Besides, the turnovers of other new cars went up from 26% in 1984 to 29 % in 1993 while the opposite was true for the period of 20 years between 1993 and 2013 with 24% in 2013.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by private companies rather than governments Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many processed foods and ready made meals contain preservatives and chemicals What are the advantages to this Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 67
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 71
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29189189189 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21700804097 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1518329634 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495014048235 0.215688989381 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2681628493 0.103423049105 259% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556605493328 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353862117307 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134566650839 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.39 61.2550243902 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.