You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words.
The first bar chart gives information about the quantity of water supplied for people and the second bar chart illustrates the level of water cleanliness standard to two various places in 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentage of water supplied in Australia and South East Asia increased over the period shown whereas the water in Australia had higher level of cleanliness than South East Asia.
Regarding the bar chart, in 1990, the percentage of water supplied in Australia doubled South East Asia with 80% and more or less 40% in order to given. In contrast, the gap shorted about 20% over a ten years period, at almost 100% for Australia and approximately 80% for South East Asia.
Looking at the second bar chart, the percent of cleanliness water at Australia was 70% in 1990 while the figure for South East Asia was 40% at that time. In 2010, Australia seen a remarkable increase in the level of cleanliness of water with over 80% while there was a slight decrease in the cleanliness water level in South East Asia with 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-21 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | phamkhuyen | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | AkshayJadon93 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | subashtimalsina112 | 72 | view |
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 89
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree and employer s reasons for hiring them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 82
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73224043716 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47464372516 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453551912568 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.0858624972 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924600562738 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060450194415 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406800136356 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750846342322 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431460953369 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.