The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009.
The pie chart illustrates information regarding the fields that nursing graduates work for and the table depicts the percentage of nurses working in the health sector, both in the United Kingdom in 2009.
Overall, the health sector had the largest proportion of nursing graduates whereas a minority of nurses chose to further study and other. In addition, working in a hospital was the most popular decision of nursing employees while mental nurse had the smallest figure.
In terms of the decision of nursing graduates, the proportion of nursing employees who worked in the health sector outweighed other areas with 84%, followed by 8% of nurses chose to continue study and working. The figure for unemployed was 4% which doubled the percentage of further study and other at 2%.
Regarding the fields of health sectors that graduates worked for, a majority of graduate nurses chose to work as hospital nurse, with 72.9%. The data for midwives had slightly higher than community nurse with 12.4% and 10.3% respectively. Other had 2.7% of total nursing graduates which approximately doubled paramedic and sixfold mental nurse, with 1.3% and 0.4% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | view | |
| 2023-03-21 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | myduyen282 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | immtee | 67 | view |
- The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree and employer s reasons for hiring them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 82
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller building Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 73
- The two bar graphs show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA and marital status of adult American in 1970 and 2000 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 61
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63495715158 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7492138287 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160725368903 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834374971984 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589323264671 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121882817567 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573902329807 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63495715158 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7492138287 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160725368903 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834374971984 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589323264671 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121882817567 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573902329807 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.