The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.
The line graph compares three countries in terms of their wheat exports over a period of 5 years.
It is clear that whereas European Community saw wheat export raise over the 5 years, Australia felt the reverse. Interestingly, beside considerable ups and downs, Canada showed the same results as at the beginning of the period.
In 1985, Australia exported 15 tonnes of wheat, while Canada and E.C. exported around 17 and 19 tons of wheat respectively. Over the following year, the wheat exports of Canada and E.C. fall by around 2 tonnes, but the figure for Australia rose by approximately 1 tonne.
From 1986 onwards, the trend of all three countries reversed. From 1986 to 1990, Australia cut the export of wheat by roughly 4 tonnes. By contrast, Canada saw an increase in wheat export of approximately 8 tonnes over 2 years. From 1988 onwards, the trend reversed. The figure for E.C. reached a plateau at the end of 1987, and then rose dramatically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | MinhGoal1 | view | |
| 2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
- The given line graph below illustrates the number of people moved from rural to urban areas of three different countries 49
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 78
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 73
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the trend reversed. The figure for E.C. reached a plateau at the end of 1987, an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84756097561 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73455725682 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0958468896 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252809508153 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104623300929 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778613141956 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175701083092 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550894434091 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.