The plan show the changes in Grange park in 1992 and today.
The two maps illustrate how grand Spark has been changed from its open in 1920 to the present.
In 1920, visitors could enter the park on Arnold Avenue from the north or the southern one on Eldon street, but the park has now has a new underground parking entrance. There was a fountain at the centre of the park which has been replaced with a huge Rose garden surrounded by many seats. The stage for musicians on the left-hand side of the fountain was demolished and replaced by an amphitheater for concerts.
Similarly, there was another Rose garden and a pond for water plants to the east of the Northern entry, but now, it was converted into a cafe and children's play area. In addition, a Rose garden and on the top right-hand corner and a glass house on the bottom one has gone and now there is a water feature.
Overall, it is obvious that the park has been rearranged significantly and more infrastructure have been built in Grange park such as a cafe, an amphitheatre for concerts, water feature and children's play area over the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-31 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
- Research into new type of medicines and treatments are essential for health and dealing with diseases Who do you think you should find these received did the researches private companies individuals or government 56
- some people think that working after retirement age should be restricted However other people believe that continue working even after retirement is beneficial Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 56
- Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop country Do you agree or disagree 73
- The plan show the changes in Grange park in 1992 and today 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65608465608 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58910249914 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8393428754 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116698625438 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507873709587 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514106965518 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686205311858 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454064849641 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.