Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualification and pexpreince when chosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree and disgree?.
The trend of recruiting initial qualities of employee in most companies is the major topic in recent years. Many of the talent acquisition enjoy hiring qualifications and experience candidate more than initial qualities, but some people against it. In my own view, I believe that recruiters should prefer personal traits rather than background education and experience while selecting candidate.
To begin with, most people after graduating the school without work experience can find it difficult to seek a job more than experience employee. Certainly, it leads to loss some potential candidates for companies. From that point, the recruiter should choose the employee on the basis of personal traits such as leadership, management, social skills and the others. These abilities give the recruiters have more reference about the candidate within consideration process, as well as a standard measure to evaluate the candidate. Furthermore, this measurement allows some graduated students to have a chance taking next step into the company.
As an illustration, most companies agree that they have to train their employee when they step into their jobs in new company even they are experience employee. This thing can lead to the discouraging situation for candidate. In a result, they will quick job more than newcomers, who have no work experience. For instance, in recent years, most multinational companies have opened the chance for people, who have the personal qualities and development potential in career. They have found that these people have significantly grown up more than other ones.
In conclusion, there are numerous reasons to justify the statement. Having personal qualities not only can give multiple benefits to the enterprise, but also bring more opportunity for the candidate without work experience. I believe that employers should recommend the potential abilities first on selecting the candidate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-03 | Mayuresh Patoliya | 73 | view |
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Some people think sports invovling violence such as boxing martial arts should be banned from tv and international sporting competitions what exrent do you agree and disagree 84
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualification and pexpreince when chosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree and disgree 73
- Some people today prefer to get advice for medical problems and do not want to visit a doctor Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54915254237 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91909482926 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4177154693 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12580157698 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426266102128 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032878523821 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831260870264 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238359327441 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54915254237 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91909482926 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4177154693 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12580157698 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426266102128 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032878523821 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831260870264 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238359327441 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.