The reading passage and lecure both about advantages ob using turtle exclusive device to prevent nets of shrimp - fishing boats from caughing turtles. The author claims that this TED device not good way to solve problem. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in the article.
First, writer states, this device that that let turtle escape may also let shrump to escape from net. and this will coast more than lost of one turtle every month. The lecturer refutes this atatement. He mentions these net accidently caugh 100 of turtle every year. He states using of TED is very effective even if this bnet trap one or mor shrump.
Second, the author argue, decreasing of time that of fishing in sea is more effective than using TED. The professore contradicts this argument. He poits to dificulity to monitor fishing boat and this is only theory. we can not inforce fishing boat to limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical.
Finally, the author saysETD is not effective for large species of sea tutles like loggerhead and leatherback turtles which can grow and become large. The professor reputs this argument. He elaborates on making a big ETD can do the same benefit to make turtle to scape from the net and resolve the problem.
The reading passage and lecure both about advantages ob using turtle exclusive device to prevent nets of shrimp - fishing boats from caughing turtles. The author claims that this TED device not good way to solve problem. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in the article.
First, writer states, this device that that let turtle escape may also let shrump to escape from net. and this will coast more than lost of one turtle every month. The lecturer refutes this atatement. He mentions these net accidently caugh 100 of turtle every year. He states using of TED is very effective even if this bnet trap one or mor shrump.
Second, the author argue, decreasing of time that of fishing in sea is more effective than using TED. The professore contradicts this argument. He poits to dificulity to monitor fishing boat and this is only theory. we can not inforce fishing boat to limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical.
Finally, the author saysETD is not effective for large species of sea tutles like loggerhead and leatherback turtles which can grow and become large. The professor reputs this argument. He elaborates on making a big ETD can do the same benefit to make turtle to scape from the net and resolve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-07 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both talking about a story of using burning mirror by Roman to attack Greek ships The auther claims three causes why this story is not real It is just myth The lecturer hwoever casts doub on claim made in article She mentions a 60
- The passage and lecture are both disccusing the surprising behaviors of elephant The writer of the passage claims that elephant has several surprtising behaviors The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mention that these elephant behavioes a 76
- Education is a very important thing in our life Physical education and social classic are as crucial as labraries and other classes and should recieve egual financial support In this essy I will give reasons to explain why I fell that First of all these c 76
- Now a days there is ahuge technology revolution in many field of life One of the important one is the computers which is devise used in a lot of field kids usualy play games by using computer in my openion playing games these game is a waste of time In th 76
- The passage and lecture are mainly about the Pluto The author states Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet and elaborates on three reason to prove that The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article by refuting each statement First writer mention t 65
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...D device not good way to solve problem. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt ...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...may also let shrump to escape from net. and this will coast more than lost of one t...
^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...r fishing boat and this is only theory. we can not inforce fishing boat to limit t...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...o limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical. Finally, the aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...o limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical. Finally, the aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76470588235 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3026831408 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1865284844 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.8125 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8125 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54342868513 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153933095188 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154860948633 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351372563984 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307131678907 0.0443174109184 693% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...D device not good way to solve problem. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt ...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...may also let shrump to escape from net. and this will coast more than lost of one t...
^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...r fishing boat and this is only theory. we can not inforce fishing boat to limit t...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...o limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical. Finally, the aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...o limit time of putting net in the sea. therefore this way impratical. Finally, the aut...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76470588235 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3026831408 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1865284844 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.8125 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8125 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54342868513 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153933095188 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154860948633 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351372563984 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307131678907 0.0443174109184 693% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.