Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts and addresses. It is a positive or negative trend?
In modern times, it is common that there have been increasing the internet services requiring their clients to disclose their own personal information such as locations, phone numbers, email addresses and even banking account numbers. In my opinion, these associated dangers are significant, but do not outweigh the benefits of a more convenient user experience.
On the one hand, concerned policymakers often argue that sensitive information registered online fosters widespread fraud. The majority of individuals store some degree of information whether it is as simple as their phone numbers and addresses or more important data such as barking details. Currently there have been the variety of methods used to stolen the aforementioned information. The criminal activities tend to phish emails, hack of websites, and even steal money from oversea bank accounts. It is true that these activities may lead unstable society. Furthermore, some companies have been reported because of selling their clients’ data. Customers’ information has become valuable commodities in the market, especially inside the telemarketing and digital marketing filed. Hence, clients may be disturbed by advertising phone calls and deceiving messages, making them offend and have a bad mood on that day.
On the other hand, the upside of posting private information on social networking sites should be overlooked. It is evident that the vast majority of individuals have decided to store personal information online regardless of growing cognizance of the risk. They find it easier to log in to a website, accept the cookies when they put their required information online. Especially, in the case of online market trading platforms and banking websites or app, consumers are willing to divulge more confidential information to enjoy the conveniences of conducting transactions faster. Additionally, in certain situation such as shopping online, when they intendedly place an order, the process only takes seconds to reach success that they do not need register their address many times.
In conclusion, giving away information to online services do not make a negative on the whole. Because it finds easier to access social networking sites and online services in some seconds. Besides, customers can experience more convenient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-08 | Minty@1411 | 89 | view |
- The map below shows the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- Food products labels should contain details information about that food To what extent do agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'steal'?
Suggestion: steal
...ave been the variety of methods used to stolen the aforementioned information. The cri...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to register'?
Suggestion: to register
... to reach success that they do not need register their address many times. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...need register their address many times. In conclusion, giving away information t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, second, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97073661238 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5216319329 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.388888889 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94444444444 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221335481681 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613536999839 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546378493076 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130237954675 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027318595348 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.