Geneticallay Modified
Both the reading and lecturer discuss the genetically modified trees and their effects on the environment and cost. The reading states that genetic modified is a process improving organisms gene and their characteristic. However, the lecturer refutes the belief presented in the reading by stating that genetic modified tres have some benefits but they have significant problems with the environment and their cost is very high.
To begin with, the passage claims that not only genetically modified technique contributes improving efficiency of trees but also reduce unfavorable effects. This argument is supported by the fact that GM trees more durable than local ones, such as papaya tress, in Hawaii, sturdy to virus infections. Nevertheless, the lecturer contradicts this idea by pointing out resistance is not main factor. Furthermore, the lecturer states being resistant to a virus can not protect other factors, such as climate changes, environmental factors and adaptation process.
Secondly, the reading mentions providing higher revenue from Genetic Modified trees. This notion is substantiated by the fact that GM trees provide higher productivity and economic advantages. They grow faster and resistant to pesticides. Yet, the lecturer challenges the argument found in the reading by revealing that GM trees increase cost of the maintenance. Moreover, the lecturer elaborates this by mentioning that GM products have to buy after harvest, and they have limited span period.
The third and last point found in the reading is that Genetic Modified trees can grow to use in the wood industry. According to the reading passage, this opinion is validated by the fact that many trees are being cut to meet demand. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts this theory by explaining that local environment suffers from the one particular GM tree. Moreover in contrast to the articles, the lecturer asserts that they use natural resources very fast, such as water, minerals and nutritients in the soil. This causing exhausting the naturel sources.
Thus, there is stark difference between the reading passage and the lecturer.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 90
- Geneticallay Modified 80
- 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ees but also reduce unfavorable effects. This argument is supported by the fact t...
^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...uffers from the one particular GM tree. Moreover in contrast to the articles, the lectur...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thus, in contrast, in fact, such as, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4578313253 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79645276415 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521084337349 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1321901924 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100353239619 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390599247758 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549840819472 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569189636755 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472933962979 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.