The line graph illustrates 3 various crime categories in England and Wales between 1970 and 2005.
Looking from overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Car thefts were very high among all these crimes. In Comparison, Street robberies were very low. All 3 Crimes in both countries showed upward trend towards the end of period. However, there was fluctuation.
Car thefts number was at 0.4 million in the year 1970 and which was more when compared to other kind of crimes and showed significant increase till 1990 and 1 million number of crimes were reached. There was sudden increase from 1990 to 1995 and hitting highest 1.6 million Car thefts. Whereas, After that, Crimes are slumped to 1 million at the end of period.
0.4 million house burglary crimes happened in both countries at 1970. There was slight growth in this crime till 1980 are at number 0.6 million. However, Crimes rate were remained steady in the 1985 and showed upward sign in the years 1990 and 1995 were at around 0.7 million and house burglary crimes were continued to decline at 2005 year, In number 0.7 million.
There were no Stree Robberies till 1990, However, These crimes are Jumped up to 0.2 million and remained steady from 2000 to 2005 year.
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 73
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 73
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 30
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87264150943 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25526459759 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4586361889 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195544300143 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835119415147 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715825050081 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140480768274 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718461551455 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87264150943 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25526459759 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4586361889 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195544300143 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835119415147 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715825050081 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140480768274 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718461551455 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.