The table compares the data of four criterias to assess the life quality of people living in five nations in 1982.
Overall, the countries having higher GNP per head supplied more individual daily calories from food. The more the US dollar the people earned, the longer the life expectancy and the lower the infant mortality rates the countries observed.
With regard to the three countries with lower individual GNP, people in Bangladesh and Bolivia earned the least income, at the level of 140 dollars and 570 dollars, respectively. These two countries also had the least daily calories supply per person and the shortest life expectancy among the five countries. Although Indonesia shared almost identical figures of GNP and life expectancy with Bolivia, its infant mortality rate was 87 per 1000 live births, which was 37 less than Bolivia.
Looking at the USA and Egypt, Egypt had the second most individual GNP of 690 dollars, which was almost half of the USA’s GNP, while Egyptian infant mortality was 97 per 1000 live birth, accounting for the third highest rate. There was 3652 daily calorie supply per head in the USA, which is much more adequate than in other countries. The USA not only had 74 years of life expectancy, but also conceived a significantly low infant mortality rate of 12 per 1000 at birth.
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership So for peace to prevail female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- The graphs below indicate the effect of treatment in two types of cancer in females Using the information in the graphs describe and compare the situation with and without treatment for the two types of cancer 84
- Government funding should only provide scholarships for best students All other funding should come from student fees and private organisations To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, third, while, as to, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94170403587 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43389962018 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8329756779 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778353738748 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444836659083 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443367661226 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704668573936 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474236927661 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.