The below bar chart compares the amount of revenue earned by four types of electronic games sold globally over seven years, from 2000 to 2006.
Overall, handheld games accounted for the significantly highest sales globally among all digital games, while they had a steady upward trend over the span of the graph period. In contrast, console games showed a consistent fall, resulting in the smallest profits in 2006.
Looking at the two traditional ones, namely handheld and console games, the former ($11 billion) almost doubled the latter's sales ($5.8 billion) in 2000. After that, these two popular games witnessed two opposite tendencies, which enlarged the gap of almost 15 billion dollars difference, with approximately six times smaller sales by console than by handheld games.
As seen in the chart, the youngest games on mobile phone initiated in 2002 conceived only $1 billion, whilst online games introduced one year earlier shared the same figure. Between 2003 and 2006, there was a noticeable growth in sales in both games. Although games on cell phones became slightly more popular than on the internet through 2003 and 2005, in the last year, internet games exceeded cell phone, at around $9 billion and $7 billion sales, respectively.
- 07 10 2017 Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted on the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the technology makes life complex so we should make the life simpler without using the technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graphs below indicate the effect of treatment in two types of cancer in females Using the information in the graphs describe and compare the situation with and without treatment for the two types of cancer 84
- The diagram below shows City Park before and after a swimming pool was constructed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 69
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'significantly the highest'.
Suggestion: significantly the highest
...erall, handheld games accounted for the significantly highest sales among all games, while they had a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile phone started in 2002 conceived only billion, whilst online games that were i...
^^
Line 6, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s’ sales exceeded mobile ones, at around billion and billion, respectively.
^^
Line 6, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eded mobile ones, at around billion and billion, respectively.
^^
Line 6, column 419, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ed mobile ones, at around billion and billion, respectively.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1256281407 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42904405972 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64824120603 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5240321149 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215733196634 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975928851242 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217346438334 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127151328734 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121959424957 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.