Although reporting crimes seems to be attractive to public’s attention and interests, debate over whether the sophisticated outlines should be banned to avoid negative impacts on society has been drawn out. On my view, it is decided by what type of contents are published for what kind of purposes are behind this practice. Media should continue publish detailed coverage when appropriate.
Timely and sensitive coverage of victims’ cases can be helpful, particularly when police department require public’s instant awareness and assistance. It can be seen in emergency situations, such as the abduction of a missing child or reminder calls for Cyber crimes against children. Detailed depictions of these specific cases can not only contribute to positive changes to shape public attitudes, but also connect government and public to communicate and collaborate to trace the suspects and save children from serious crimes.
Meanwhile, the media’s coverage in certain ways can facilitate governments to act on serious crimes which provoke massive tragedies. Real-life examples can be seen in shooting cases in American schools. After media published narrative descriptions on how suspects accessed to weapons and how they carried them while entering schools, the provincial and national governments enacted weapon restriction laws for youngsters. More importantly, they invested more budgets on public school security systems, and later built teenage mental wellness and post-traumatic management programs which were proved to be beneficial for children undergone the brutal crimes.
By saying that, some people are quite concerned about there is a risk of leaking out critical information showing police investigation progress. Consequently, it may favour suspects or criminals to disguise and escape. However, some cold cases were surprisingly solved by people providing vital clues and evidence, and volunteering to be witnesses, because they either recognized the criminals on TV or the reports awakened their memories of crime scenes.
In sum, some specific content may have potentially negative influences on public, whilst the significant positives with proper purposes cannot be neglected, and instead it should be further promoted. Besides, the profound solutions or policies on how to avoid these “bad consequences”, as well as to better excel the beneficial aspects of media coverage need to be discussed in depth by public, media itself, and government.
- Government funding should only provide scholarships for best students All other funding should come from student fees and private organisations To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that our behaviour customs and traditions are no longer relevant and have to change due to the influence of modern ways of life Do you agree or disagree Include any relevant examples in your response 95
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- 07 10 2017 Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted on the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66315789474 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91453041408 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647368421053 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5450513774 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.588235294 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195085584332 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564807056712 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346726728308 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109729884422 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265108687973 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.