Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sports people are too high, while others argue that sports salaries are fair.Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is undoubted to say that sports is a multi-million-pound industry, people around the world flock to sporting events or watch their favourite teams faithfully on television. As a result, professional sports athletes receive huge salaries. There is some debate about whether such outrageously high salaries are justified.
On the first analysis, sports players do not provide such vital service for society as other jobs like doctors or teachers, so the fact that a football player can earn more money than a teacher is unreasonable. Doctors and teachers dedicate at least five or ten years of grueling education and internship; their work saves lives, produces the future citizens. However, professionals in the fields above usually struggle to make ends meet, despite their meaningful and critical contribution to society. It is not the end of the world without professional football. Hence, we should place a higher emphasis on professionals such as nurses and teachers.
On the other hand, those who believe that sports stars' pay are justified might argue that the number of professionals with real talent is very few, in which the top players should be paid well. Athletes train rigorously from an early age to become peak performers in their field. They face tremendous pressure in each and every game, match or competition and they even can be stalked by paparazzi. At the same time, their outstanding achievements bring honour and attention to not only themselves but also to their teams, schools, cities, or countries.
In my view, paying an enormous sum of money to sportspeople is superfluous. We need to reconsider our social priorities and reduce the disparity in income among professionals. By doing so, we can create societies where everyone feels valued, appreciated, and appropriately compensated for their own vocation or specialization.
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 56
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped by four age groups 80
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 87
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, well, at least, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33220338983 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07977621679 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684745762712 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6387535568 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176634082407 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507726397448 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583340938782 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102905883392 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876093841488 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.