In Vietnam multi-generational homes are common. In the past it may have been easy to bridge age differences within these households, but these days relationships have become more strained.
Why has this change in dynamic occurred?
What could be done to preserve family ties?
Living with three or more generations in a house has become a natural culture of almost all families in Vietnam. Although it may have been easy to cut the aged differences between human beings in the pastime, today, the connection between the people in each household has become tense. I will write about why this atmosphere has differed and what could be changed to generate family ties more sustainable.
There are several reasons why people couldn't bridge the gap, from my perspective, there are two major causes. Initially, there is a lack of understanding among the family's members, due to technological improvements and adjustment in thinking, which has led to the contrast in open-minded and original mind. For instance, Not getting married is one bulk of a great many new lifestyles of the young that majority of the elderly also the adults couldn't adapt, causing lots of conflicts with the decision.
Secondly, some family has someone immigrate to a foreign country so that the gap between human beings is larger than the family who not has. From my experience, my relatives have studied abroad for five years and then they decide to constantly live there and rarely come home to meet their parents.
Generally, there are three suggestions could solve this problem. First of all, the people in a family should adapt to a new way of thinking. They should ethically and morally tolerate their beloved, of course, these can't transgress the law. Next, there should enhance in interaction and communication in the family's relationship. Sharing expectation and experience is an appropriate recommendation. Finally, about immigration, hence there should annually have occasions be held among the people in the household. It is believed that Out of sight, out of mind so should not have any changes in the family, it will be problematic to bridge the gap.
In conclusion, there are plenty of explanations for which exist this dynamic. Overall, I assume the most importance is the human beings should listen, perceive and keep an open mind to the new.
- In Vietnam multi generational homes are common In the past it may have been easy to bridge age differences within these households but these days relationships have become more strained Why has this change in dynamic occurred What could be done to preserv 70
- Plan a problem and solution essay for the issue that you chose explaining what should be done about it 73
- Plan a problem and solution essay for the issue that you chose explaining what should be done about it 78
- In Vietnam multi generational homes are common In the past it may have been easy to bridge age differences within these households but these days relationships have become more strained Why has this change in dynamic occurred What could be done to preserv 78
Comments
thank you for your comment
thank you for your comment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... There are several reasons why people couldnt bridge the gap, from my perspective, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...majority of the elderly also the adults couldnt adapt, causing lots of conflicts with t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rarely come home to meet their parents. Generally, there are three suggestions c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...olerate their beloved, of course, these cant transgress the law. Next, there should...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07647058824 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80535819497 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0941797845 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.529411765 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229400486709 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643313699735 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687104240517 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114726030994 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112393182778 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.