Schools are the only place to receive true education? Do you agree or disagree?
Along with the advance in social civilizations, formal training is aimed to acquire. Despite the long-lasting accepted belief acknowledgment of schools’ unique role in educating, not only I but most people conspicuously recognize that books and hands-on experience have equal importance in distributing true knowledge.
On the one hand, schools are always the greatest places where students are able to obtain official knowledge. The fact that a handful of experienced and well-trained teachers can be the strongest evidence to prove the correctness of attending schools indicates that with their teaching methods, students can swiftly receive suitable education. People widely believe that schooling is not something simple to get through reading books or searching on websites, it requires many more skills that only teachers can help with. Besides, full-equipped schools are ideal for learners to practice theories trained by teachers so that they can solidly concrete the valuable knowledge. That is why they can save much time and be more confident in learning as well as working in the future without facing many times of failure. However, this stereotype is no longer suitable for modern society.
Conversely, the exclusive role of schools has been replaced partly by first-hand experience and the availability of material. As a matter of books, previous generations did not have access to ample sources of knowledge; therefore, teachers in schools were the only ones whom they relied on to absorb new things. However, the drastic change of the internet and websites without any constraints has shed new light on completely new awareness. Apparently, online books are now shared freely with passionate learners who are in search of true education, which facilitates the learning paths of those from various walks of life. Furthermore, practical knowledge in this day and age is considered the best teacher ever for learners. The reason is that abstract knowledge is an arduous task regardless of the convenience of fully modern devices supported so that only direct experience earned by the expense of time and endeavors are capable of teaching learners. Not schools nor teachers can do that. Hence, no matter how dedicated teachers nor modern schools are, there are still several ways to achieve formal education.
In conclusion, with all aforementioned convincing claims, schools are not the only approach to knowledge, books and experience do play the same role.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 83 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41968911917 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90120279143 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593264248705 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.87702761 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167804281279 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537022390287 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474094754304 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110290578815 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167146589255 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.