The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of using electric medical record over traditional paper-based record keeping. The author claims that using medical records in electronic databases more beneficial than traditional paper-based record keeping, and he gave three advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says, the benefits from using electronic medical record are uncertain.
First, the author states, the use of electronic records can save money, he mentions, the doctor can easily access the records and duplicate and transfer when necessary. This point challenged by lecturer, she elaborates on by saying, doctor dose not thru out the paper, instead he keeps them because he may need these papers for legal reason, therefore they still need storage cost.
Second, the writer argues, electronic records can prevent errors, he says, these reducing hand writing errors. This argument is refuted by professor, she says, electronic medical records will not eliminate the possibility of hand writing errors hence the doctor use handwriting to make notes and to write prescription to patients, in additions, they give these notes to staffs to print them in the computer.
finally, the electronic medical records can help aid medical research and make it possible to gather large amount of information. In the other hand, the professor posits that access to medical information stay has difficulty, moreover have to follow complicated consequences, furthermore need to get patient permission. Also some patients block their account and no one can use it.
The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of using electric medical record over traditional paper-based record keeping. The author claims that using medical records in electronic databases more beneficial than traditional paper-based record keeping, and he gave three advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says, the benefits from using electronic medical record are uncertain.
First, the author states, the use of electronic records can save money, he mentions, the doctor can easily access the records and duplicate and transfer when necessary. This point challenged by lecturer, she elaborates on by saying, doctor dose not thru out the paper, instead he keeps them because he may need these papers for legal reason, therefore they still need storage cost.
Second, the writer argues, electronic records can prevent errors, he says, these reducing hand writing errors. This argument is refuted by professor, she says, electronic medical records will not eliminate the possibility of hand writing errors hence the doctor use handwriting to make notes and to write prescription to patients, in additions, they give these notes to staffs to print them in the computer.
finally, the electronic medical records can help aid medical research and make it possible to gather large amount of information. In the other hand, the professor posits that access to medical information stay has difficulty, moreover have to follow complicated consequences, furthermore need to get patient permission. Also some patients block their account and no one can use it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-28 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
- Parent should pay attention for their kids and take care of them They have to spend enough time with their children and build a strong relationship between them Some parent prefer spend that time by playing game or sport other use the time doing together 66
- The passage and lecture are both talking about declination of cedar population in North America The author claims several reason to explain causes of this declination the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He states these reasons are inadequed 60
- The passage and lecture both discus the declination of frog population The passage gives three methods to solve this problem But the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She says non of these methods are practical to prevent frog inclination Firs 76
- The reading and lecture about making a strict rules for handiling and storing coalk ash The representative companies of power have opposite veiw they argue that new regulation are not important and may cause negative consequent First the pwer company say 61
- The main topic in reading passage and lecture about Agnostides which are a group of marine animals These species extinicted befor many years ago and their fossils do no give a good information about them The writer claims several theriories about how Agno 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... keeping, and he gave three advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... staffs to print them in the computer. finally, the electronic medical records can hel...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hermore need to get patient permission. Also some patients block their account and n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46963562753 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71058603097 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.233942853 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527472710937 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225198272236 0.0996497079465 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233600680987 0.0662205650399 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313551715602 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.273205967633 0.0443174109184 616% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.