The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of young individuals engage in higher education in three different years, 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of students who take part in further education in countries A and D is significantly higher in 2010. At the same time, there is no dramatic differences in the two remaining nations over the period shown.
In 2000, the figure for pupils who attend higher education in country A registered the lowest, at about 35%. This number in the three other areas is nearly the same, at 40% in country B, around 43% and 45% for nation C and D respectively.
Young people in upper education in 2010 in all four countries accounted for the largest proportion, at 55% in country A. Then, it suddenly had a sharp fall of 15% in the following nation and continued to grow until it reached a peak of 60% in the last country. In 2005, figures for young individuals study for higher schooling jumped to 40% in country D after having a fluctuation in those three places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 39
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three different sources between 1990 and 2005 73
- When designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 88
- The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67032967033 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72008545296 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.4395290782 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308929567818 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136159293916 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144103509696 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211615622354 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145653328721 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.