Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Universities provide knowledge for people's future careers. Most of them, let students spend most of their time on academic and theoretical classes without practicing them. Some people suggest that younger generations should be offered hand-on experience to be ready for later work. I agree with this opinion. I will elaborate on my points of view in more detail below.
Theoretical knowledge is the first and foremost thing that understudies have to study, but practice also plays a crucial role in the process acquiring knowledge. Without hand-on courses, students won't be able to grasp the purposes of subjects and gain in-depth knowledge. Moreover, if universities solely concentrate on teaching theories, but practice, students cannot apply what they studied their lives or careers, let alone develop their knowledge. As an example, Vietnamese students are taught so much grammar and vocabulary about English, but little about speaking and listening. Therefore, they can pass reading exams easily, but they cannot communicate after 12 years of studying English.
Practice not only makes the subjects more attractive, but also helps students remember knowledge longer. Practical training allows students to become involved in subjects rather than listening to theory passively. Additionally, some scientific theories are not always correct, practice is a great chance for students to discover and improve them. Theoretical studying is an individual work, however, in some subjects, classmates need to cooperate to complete duties. By doing so, students can improve soft skills such as teamwork and communication.
University should create more opportunities for students to practice their theoretical knowledge. Theories are meaningless if they are not applied and bring benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Ayushi Jain | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Lyly241096 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | Lyly241096 | 56 | view |
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree 73
- 9 Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 84
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74060150376 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86562107747 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646616541353 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7271808495 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2564149794 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851610709713 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763288182188 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161524919907 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556024891461 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.