Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others.
Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught
separately.
Do you agree or disagree?
The purpose of education is not only to give students with knowledge but also to teach them how to become good people. Disobedient and good students studying together is a great chance for them all to improve themselves. Thus, I strongly disagree with categorizing classes according to students' moral values. Below I will explain my opinions in more detail.
Many people believe that noisy students interfere with the acquisition of knowledge of other students, but in fact, schools have rules to control this behaviour. Moreover, teachers also have the responsibilities of supervising and preventing inappropriate actions that might negatively affect others. On the contrary, studying together brings positive influences to good students, such as teaching them how to help and care for disruptive classmates. This wonderful opportunity to be able to teach good students how to be beneficial members of society in a way that helps worse students overcome their difficulties and become better.
Furthermore, categorizing students is discriminatory. While there are few negative influences on students who are supposedly good students, it seriously affects the psychology of disruptive students. It makes them feel belittled and isolated from society. They do not have good students around to look up to to change themselves and to be better. In addition, grouping those students facilitates them to study bad things from each other. Teachers also find it difficult to control a group of all naughty students.
Rather than separating students based on their behaviours, schools and teachers should find out why they are disruptive. It is the best way to help them adapt to ordinary students and protect the rest of the class from the negative effects they might have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | neverlandforestcat | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | neverlandforestcat | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | DEEP PANCHAL | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Lyly241096 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Lyly241096 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree 73
- 1 As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 73
- 26 The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world s cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be 84
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ot have good students around to look up to to change themselves and to be better. In ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36330935252 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96656183234 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4068819339 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357649940372 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10733261223 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591667757477 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210418027397 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454037506157 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.