In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
Nowadays, it’s quite common for students to have one gap year after graduating from high school, especially in developed countries. There are many reasons for this phenomenon. Young people can gain lots of benefits as well as drawbacks from this decision.
Students in high school are often viewed as being too young and having little life experience to determine which careers interest and suit them. Travelling, working or volunteering for a year can broaden their horizons and offer them a chance to understand themself better. This is not only a trend among rich students but this is also among poor people who are looking for financial independence. Furthermore, it is an opportunity for them to become stronger and learn how to cope with difficulties they might encounter in their university years.
In addition to the benefits listed above, some concerns exist that student may forget knowledge if they have such a long break time and that leaves them disadvantaged to pass the university entrance exam. More seriously, some students lose their interest in studying due to their immersion in earning money. Even when they return to universities, some students even cant adapt to the academics and other students again.
I encourage young people who feel vague about their future and ambition should consider taking a gap year. That’s definitely better than making a wrong decision and deciding to give up it some years later. Break time can teach young people many positive things but also can tempt them to do things that are not good. When they pass that time, I believe that they will be more mature and will have better results in universities since they know what they need and what they want.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | Uyeen | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Nguyen Lan Chi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- 9 Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree 84
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree 73
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 84
- 26 The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world s cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...urn to universities, some students even cant adapt to the academics and other studen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01052631579 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54018124858 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9313345195 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285025326884 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985791203794 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522536995215 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171758947444 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657008534257 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.