Nowadays consumer goods are cheaper to buy. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Currently, it is more affordable for citizens to purchase consumer products. While there are some obvious benefits of this tendency, I would argue that cheaper goods would bring about much more drawbacks.
To begin with, cheaper products do wonders for individuals due to some main points. First of all, since the price of the household stuff is lower, these families would not be put on the financial problem which might not make them involve in multiple jobs in order to afford high daily expenses. As a result, parents could spend more time educating and playing with their children, which they frequently could not receive from their close people in hectic lives nowadays. Second, cheaper goods might encourage consumers to go shopping more, which could enhance the revenues of those manufacturers. For instance, I would like to purchase more staple foods when these products are on sale or cheaper than normalcy. Therefore, making goods cheaper is also a way to boost the need of consumers, which helps to enhance those companies’ interests.
However, I believe that there would appear some permanent disadvantages when goods are cheaper. First and foremost, every company tries to attract more consumers by reducing the price of their products, which leads to an incredibly competitive trade market amongst those brands. Consequently, this creates an imbalance in the national economy because of the frequently unstable prices. If these companies do not put down the price of their products, they could not compete with others. Furthermore, as the price of those products still relies on other factors such as ingredients or processing costs, making these goods more affordable could affect the existence of those factories. This might discourage people to start up because of the high risks which are caused by rival brands.
In conclusion, while more affordable household goods could create some obvious merits, I need to admit that this trend could bring more negative impacts to manufacturers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-27 | bilal_chaudhry | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 82 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | Gyan | view | |
| 2021-02-05 | Gyan | 10 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | Haseya | 73 | view |
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 50
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.303125 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63834220854 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6859155538 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852038471325 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375262294099 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304551649122 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563095801588 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251172620038 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.303125 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63834220854 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6859155538 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852038471325 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375262294099 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304551649122 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563095801588 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251172620038 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.