Today, TV channels provide man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows, why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is a common situation that watchers could visualize or search for men-related sport programmes easier than women’s sport shows. This happens due to some reasons, and I believe it would be better for every nation to balance showing time on TV between male’s sport and female’s sport games.
To begin with, there are some compelling reasons why TV channels popularize men’s sport programmes. Firstly, the investment of each nation still focus more on sports for men, which reinforces and provides necessary conditions for men to participate in these physically demanding sports. In other words, because of not being trained seriously, it is difficult to find out a female sport talent compared to men who are practiced since they were a child. As a result, sport organizations or competitions find it hard to organize an event among women. Secondly, since men tend to be interested in sport games rather than women, which is understandable when TV channels would like to attract and boost the number of male viewers instead of girls who is considered to cook and clean in society.
However, from my point of view, I would love to ask TV channels to show men’s sport games and women’s ones in equal time. The point here is that balancing time in both kinds of sport is a great way to illustrate the fairness and impartiality between genders. Moreover, justice is an aspect of life as the sport would help to facilitate the civilization and development of a nation. For example, using sport programmes to enhance the importance of women in society might partly support reducing the violence in families. As a result, every single household is healthy, which contributes to a modern and safe life for the whole nation.
In conclusion, some causes of this phenomenon are given above, and personally speaking, I support the idea of providing the same amount of time on TV for men’s sport and women’s sport shows.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 78
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impartiality between genders. Moreover, justice is an aspect of life as the spor...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or men’s sport and women’s sport shows.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99380804954 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76152660608 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6512906735 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.076923077 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559406959848 0.244688304435 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205672410831 0.084324248473 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105943602213 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369812395483 0.151304729494 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028521450539 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.