Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
Opinions are divided on whether the fact that CEOs of large companies earn significantly higher than ordinary workers is indispensable or unfair. I believe that the latter is the case under most circumstances, nevertheless, there are some examples of CEOs who justify higher pay.
The idea of huge paycheques to directors is advocated by people due to the fact that they deserve it. The belief is that they are key to the success of any company and there are a limited number of candidates who have the skills, the personality and the disposition to be at the higher position of a company. As the board of directors bring profit to an organization, they are identified as an asset of a company. It is also thought that their lifelong experience, strategic business skills and not everyone is capable enough to take their role, make them a highflier and more attractive candidate for a company to pay high.
In contrast, the above arguments can be rejected on the grounds of pay ratio inequality, and the fact that role of an average chief executive officer is overstated. With regard to the former, the huge income gap promotes disparity between employees at the top and the bottom positions, which means it creates a sense of immorality among mediocre workers that it takes them years to earn a sum of money, which a managing director would earn in a month. As far as the role of most top executives is concerned, the job of the average executive officer, which is a managerial type and that has neither founded a business nor been a visionary is overemphasized. In fact, some of the entrepreneurs, such as Steve Jobs at Apple and Elon Musk at Tesla, are exceptional talents who have forged revolutionary technologies from the ground up and deserved to be paid much higher than an ordinary employee.
In conclusion, I believe that usually, it is inequitable to have a much higher remuneration of the company's directors than a median worker. However, there are some examples of CEOs in favour of their high salary packages because of their extraordinary skills.
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 84
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this 78
- Some parents believe that child should not waste time by reading entertainment books but instead they should spend time to read educational books only. What is you opinion about this? 78
- In many countries traditions and customs are disappearing What are the reasons What should parents and schools do to keep our traditions alive 73
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...a visionary is overemphasized. In fact, some of the entrepreneurs, such as Steve Jobs at Ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87252124646 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93708283046 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538243626062 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2033488316 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4166666667 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170427648834 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631136591938 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681162385843 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114585238754 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605423316224 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.