Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, more attention has been placed on the opinion that university students should experience more practical training rather than merely acquire academic knowledge. Personally, I totally support this viewpoint for the following reasons.
To commence with, only giving theoretical lessons may decrease student’s interest in the major. It is due to the fact that theoretical lectures only require reading, listening and writing which is a repeated and boring process. As a result, many students are unwilling to attend these classes enthusiastically and voluntarily. Moreover, if universities solely have theory-based method of educating, students may not need to attend higher education because they feel that they can find and read these documents themselves at home.
In addition, practical training during the courses will be helpful for students in their later life. It is because these classes provide students with chances to speak, to discuss and to apply their own understanding to actively tackle a problem. When experiencing with their own ability and solutions with a basic knowledge background, they may find it easier to acquire the knowledge given. Furthermore, this helps these students to get accustomed to real-life situations so that they are able to solve better when facing similar ones in their later life. For example, surgical students should have a chance to observe a real operation and to practice on their own after attending theoretical lessons. This helps prevent them from fumbling and making minor but lethal mistakes when working in such a professional place as a hospital.
To conclude, it is true that students should not be given too much theoretical lectures due to their lengthy and boring essence. Rather, I believe that students, when fully equipped with practical skills in university, will perform better in their future job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Ayushi Jain | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Lyly241096 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | Lyly241096 | 56 | view |
- The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 56
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in addition, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45205479452 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83730344893 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8338426702 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226419597567 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770158578893 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485596027993 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136829626695 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467385720996 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.